Apple just announced their latest piece of hardware – the iPad. Now, I don’t follow Apple technology religiously – actually, I barely follow it at all, only that when the latest dinger flies out into the public, everyone talks about it.
This time around, I saw a lot of disappointment. Facebook statuses (statusi? stati?), tweeties, and internet news articles across the board were bashing the iPad for it’s apparent lack of ability to do anything useful given its size usability. No multitasking, no keyboard, slow processor, no camera… these are just some of the things that you can see with only a single swift glance.
But then I read another blog that pointed out something interesting – it’s actually not that uncommon for Apple to release products that, quite frankly, have a shallow set of features – even if features exist in other technologies, or are capable of existing. Why? Because people will buy it, just because it has the little “i” in front of the name and Steve Jobs says it’s cool. And then they’ll buy it again next year when the iPad 2 comes up with a few additional features. And again, the following year, and again. People are buying the same product 4 times. That’s not exactly going to encourage Apple to release something fully featured.
Don’t believe me? Take the iPhone. Sure, it was great when it came out. It was totally new, and really, there wasn’t much to compare it to. Lots of people went out and got themselves one. Apple fans, phone fans, gadget-o-philes, they all loved it. And then the next year there was the iPhone 3G, and following that the iPhone 3GS… and I’m not sure I know anyone now, who owns an iPhone, even those who picked it up in the beginning, who doesn’t have the latest version of the hardware.
the iPad is a little more noticable this time. After all, while the iPhone was fairly unique, and essentially spawned a whole genre of phones, the iPad is a lot like… well, it’s a lot like a lot of things. People know what a laptop is, they know what an iPhone is, they know what an e-Book reader is. They even know what a tablet PC is. So far, the iPad looks like all of these things… but really, none of these things. It’s like the worst of all worlds. Okay, it’s got Apple’s crazy hi-tech multi-touch thing going on, and that’s new for a tablet, but what good is that if you can’t really do the things on the iPad that you would want to d0 on that sort of machine. You’ve already got your phones for calling, texting, and even browsing the interwebs on the go. You’ve got your laptops for hardcore, mobile doing-work sorts of things. You’ve got your netbooks for typing and browsing the internet anywhere and everywhere. You’ve got e-readers for reading books on screens that wont make your eyes bleed after reading text for 5 minutes.
So where does the iPad fit in? Maybe it sort of does things that all of those technologies do, but so far it doesn’t do them very well.
And so here’s my point: don’t buy an iPad. Even if you love apple technology. Even if you have plenty of cash to spend on gadgets willy-nilly. Don’t buy it. Force Apple to release something fully featured, something that will actually accomplish tasks you want it to, something that has a place in this technology-packed world. Don’t let them trick you into buying the same toy 4 times, starting with a really crappy version. Don’t buy an iPad. That’s your power, as a consumer.
-wolfie
PS another reason not to buy an iPad? It doesn’t support flash. That means you won’t be able to watch Don’t Mess With Blake on it.
Filed under: General | 2 Comments »